Overview of Proposal Components
Proposals are always attempts to make some people decide to take some action
2. Proposals are always focused on a problem (whether your audience realizes the problem exists or not) and then provide a solution to that problem
3. Proposals also convince and audience that the solution being proposed is both fair and feasible
What's the Difference Between Evaluations and Proposals?
Strictly speaking, evaluation arguments are focused on judgments (this is how you should feel about something), whereas proposal arguments are focused on actions (this is what you should). In practice, however, a judgment about an object often suggests a particular action and suggesting a particular action implies a judgment of some sort (thus, evaluation arguments often contain proposals and vice-versa). In other words, the real difference might one of emphasis or degree rather than kind.
Examples from arguments I was involved in yesterday:
Evaluation Arguments
How do we invent Evaluation arguments?
Much like definitional arguments ("Is X a Y?"), evaluations usually also involve a criteria-match structure structure, but in this case you are not providing the criteria that a thing must meet to be defined in a category, but the criteria it must meet to be evaluated as a "good" or "bad" instance of whatever category to which it already belongs. In other words, it follows the structure "X is (not) a good Y because it (fails to) meet(s) criteria Q, R, P."
Proposal Arguments
How do we invent Proposal arguments?
Much like evaluations, proposals are created based on specific criteria and follow a basic structure: "We should (not) do X." Proposals are typically arranged in a three part structure:
1. Convincing the audience that a problem exists
2. Showing the particulars of your proposal (your solution to the problem)
3. Justifying why your proposal should be enacted (that your proposal is feasible and will have positive outcomes).
Priorities: Is the real challenge convincing your audience that a problem exists or is it convincing them of a viable solution to a problem they already know exists?
Other Stasis Arguments (beside evaluation and Definition) that often Appear in Proposals:
Proposals often make use of both Categorical and Resemblance arguments. Both work by putting the item in question in relation to another item for which the audience already has strong feelings. Proposals also almost always make use of Cause/Consequence arguments, as a rhetor needs to account for both the positive and negative consequences of a planned proposal.
Consider for instance several claims that might be use to argue that WSU should abolish its fraternity and sorority system: (This is a "Priority Problem" proposal - it would not be hard to abolish the system - the hard part is convincing necessary stakeholders that it should be abolished):
Practice with Proposal Elements
Let's reverse-engineer the readings for today by asking the questions a writer would pose to themselves when writing the piece:
Proposal Questions:
1. What is being proposed?
2. Does this proposal prioritize the problem or the solution? Why?
3. What does the audience know about this topic and how do they feel about it?
4. Are any other stasis issues (definition, resemblance, cause-consequence) used?
5. Does the author do a good job of identifying positive consequence that will occur if the proposal is enacted and/or negative consequences that will occur if the proposal is not enacted?
6. What are the most effective strategies used by the author in making their proposal persuasive?
For your last response, read this article and answer the above six questions. Post them on your personal pages under the heading "Response #6."